A- de 2019
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
✓Claimant Carlos Francisco Salas Garcia
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se niega porque actor no demostró cumplimiento de criterios fijados por la Corte Constitucional para la procedencia del control constitucional
- Cuando se alega la interpretación de una norma se debe cumplir con una mayor carga argumentativa
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia.
Por considerar la Sala Plena de la Corporación que la providencia cuestionada no es arbitraria, decide CONFIRMARLA en su integridad.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto del 10 de junio de 2019 dictado por el magistrado sustanciador Alberto Rojas Rios, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda identificada con el numero de radicacion D-13182.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.